se habla español

Suffolk (631) 621-6183

Nassau (516) 240-9904

Menu

Case Study | Liquor Liability

$1,025,000 Recovery

for a victim of a drunk driving crash

Amount Recovered $1.025 Million
Resolution Settlement Prior to Trial

Overview

The driver of a vehicle was over-served at a local bar and became intoxicated. He crashed his vehicle driving home from the bar and caused substantial injuries to our client. The driver was arrested and prosecuted for DWI. Through strategic coordination of the criminal and civil proceedings, Palermo Law recovered $1,025,000 — a result that would not have been possible without pursuing the bar under New York’s Dram Shop Act.

Legal Strategy

1 Identified the Bar as a Second Defendant

From the outset, we recognized that the driver’s insurance limits alone were unlikely to fully compensate our client. We investigated the events preceding the crash and established that the defendant had been drinking at a local bar immediately before the accident — opening a claim under New York’s Dram Shop Act (GOL §11-101).

2 Coordinated Timing With the Criminal Prosecution

Rather than rushing to depose the defendant, we waited for the criminal case to resolve. Once the driver entered a guilty plea, his plea allocution — sworn testimony on the record — documented exactly how much he had consumed that night. We then proceeded to his civil deposition.

3 Used Sworn Criminal Testimony to Lock in the Facts

At deposition, the defendant could not contradict his own guilty plea. The plea allocution established the amount of alcohol consumed and the sequence of events — making it impossible for the defense to minimize his intoxication or dispute how much he drank at the bar.

4 Pursued the Bar’s Insurance Under the Dram Shop Act

With the drinking established on the record, we pursued the bar for serving a visibly intoxicated patron. The bar’s liability insurer contributed significantly to the settlement. Without the bar’s coverage, our client would have been severely under-compensated — the driver’s policy alone was not enough to reflect the full extent of her injuries.

Why this case mattered

The Dram Shop claim was not an afterthought — it was the key to fair compensation. New York law holds establishments liable when they serve alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then causes injury. By identifying both the driver and the bar as defendants and using the criminal proceeding to build an airtight evidentiary record, we ensured our client recovered what she was owed.

Driver’s Insurer Policy limits applied
~30%
Bar’s Insurer Dram Shop liability
~70%

Contribution split approximate. Total recovery: $1,025,000 combined.

Key Outcomes

  • Criminal guilty plea used as civil evidence — defendant’s sworn allocution locked in consumption facts at deposition
  • Two defendants, two insurance policies — combining both sources of recovery was essential to just compensation
  • Bar held liable under GOL §11-101 — over-service of a visibly intoxicated patron established as a separate basis for liability
All Case Results

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is different, and the results obtained in this matter depended on the specific facts and circumstances involved. This case study is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Take the next step

Have You Suffered a Serious Injury?

When you’re ready to talk, we’re here. We offer a free, no obligation consultation at any of our 9 offices across Long Island, and we’re happy to come to you if you’re unable to travel. We have been fighting for Long Island families for over  25 years.

We’ll give you our honest assessment and tell you exactly how we’d approach your case. Our record speaks for itself. Our team has never represented an insurance company and never will. When you call Palermo Law, you’ll know quickly why so many Long Island families have trusted us since 1994.

Get Started Today