Left-Turn Accident Lawyers Serving All of Long Island
- $75+ millionRecovered Settlements and verdicts across all practice areas
- 25+Years Handling personal injury cases on Long Island
- 450+Reviews Five-star Google reviews from clients across Long Island
- 9Offices Across Nassau and Suffolk Counties
A left turn is the most dangerous routine thing a driver does. It means crossing a lane of traffic coming the other way, and on Long Island that lane is usually moving fast. A left into a shopping center on Hempstead Turnpike. A left off Jericho Turnpike onto a side street. A left at a light on Route 110 with three lanes of oncoming traffic to judge. The turning driver picks a gap, the gap closes, and the person coming the other way takes the hit.
If you were hit by a driver turning left, the law is on your side. New York requires a left-turning driver to yield to oncoming traffic, and failing to yield is negligence in itself. The turning driver carries the burden of explaining the crash.
Left turns were the critical event in 22.2% of all crashes in NHTSA’s national crash causation survey, published in 2010. Right turns accounted for 1.2%, nearly twenty times fewer.
Most of these collisions are intersection crashes, and our T-bone accident page covers how intersection fault gets fought in general. This page covers the left turn itself. What the statute requires, what your signal decides, the speeding defense you’ll hear in almost every one of these cases, and what happens when you were the driver turning. No-fault, the serious injury threshold, and how a case gets valued are covered on our Long Island car accident lawyer page.
Case Result
$725,000 for a Rider Hit by a Truck Turning Left
A commercial truck made a left turn directly into our client’s path. The defense argued he was riding too fast, which is the defense in almost every left-turn case. He had fractured a vertebra in his neck. We settled the case before depositions, at the point of maximum leverage.
Who Is at Fault in a Left-Turn Accident in New York?
The driver who turned left, in nearly every case.
Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141 requires a driver turning left within an intersection, or into an alley, private road, or driveway, to yield the right of way to any vehicle approaching from the opposite direction that’s within the intersection or close enough to be an immediate hazard. New York courts treat a violation as negligence per se. The violation itself is the negligence, and the turning driver has to come forward with a non-negligent explanation.
The Second Department, the appellate court that decides Long Island cases, restated the rule in Goodluck v. Azeez in March 2026. The driver with the right of way “is entitled to assume that the opposing operator will yield.” In that case the court dismissed the claim against the oncoming driver entirely, because he had the right of way, the other car failed to yield, and he lacked the time to avoid the collision. A driver “who has only seconds to react to a vehicle which has failed to yield” is not comparatively negligent for failing to avoid it.
That’s the starting position for a person who was hit by a left-turning driver. The turn was a violation, you were entitled to expect it wouldn’t happen, and a few seconds of reaction time isn’t fault. Steve’s overview of how fault is assigned by crash type puts it in plain terms. The driver making the left turn is usually the one at fault, and a speeding argument against the other driver, where it holds up at all, usually reduces fault by a small portion.
Green Light, Green Arrow, Flashing Yellow Arrow
Which signal the turning driver faced decides most of the case, because each one assigns the duty to yield differently.
| Signal the turning driver faced | What it permits | Who yields |
|---|---|---|
| Steady green light (no arrow) | A left turn, but only through a gap in oncoming traffic | The turning driver yields to all oncoming traffic under § 1141 and to pedestrians in the crosswalk under § 1111 |
| Steady green arrow | A protected left turn while oncoming traffic is held on red | Oncoming traffic yields. The turning driver still yields to anyone lawfully in the intersection or crosswalk |
| Flashing yellow arrow | A left turn when there’s a safe gap, per NYSDOT | The turning driver yields to oncoming traffic and pedestrians, same as a green light |
| Steady yellow arrow | The protected phase is ending | The turning driver should not enter. Oncoming traffic is about to get its green |
| Steady red arrow | No left turn | A turn on a red arrow is a signal violation on top of a failure to yield |
The row that decides the most Long Island cases is the first one. A green light is not permission to turn. It’s permission to turn when it’s safe, and turning drivers routinely treat the two as the same thing. The second most common dispute is the green arrow, where the turning driver says the arrow was on and the oncoming driver says it had ended. That’s a timing question, and the signal’s timing records answer it the same way they answer a yellow light dispute. Our red light and stop sign page covers how those records get obtained and read.
NYSDOT has been replacing the old signal heads on Long Island with flashing yellow arrows, and drivers have been confused by them since the first ones went in. The flashing arrow doesn’t change the law. It’s a reminder that the turn is unprotected, and a driver who turns on it into oncoming traffic has violated § 1141 just as if the light had been a plain green.
The Five Left Turns Behind Most Long Island Crashes
Long Island’s major roads move heavy through traffic, and most of the left turns across them are unprotected. Multiple oncoming lanes, commercial driveways every few hundred feet, and left-turn lanes that face each other across the median. These are the turns we see in our cases, and what proves each one.
-
The driveway turn
A driver on Hempstead Turnpike, Route 110, or Montauk Highway turns left across oncoming lanes into a shopping center, gas station, or side street. No signal, no protected phase, nothing but the driver’s judgment of the gap. § 1141 applies to turns into driveways and private roads exactly as it applies at intersections. The evidence is the point of impact, which shows how far across the lanes the turner got before the oncoming car arrived.
-
The wave-through
Oncoming traffic is backed up. A driver in the near lane stops and waves the turner across. The turner pulls through the gap and into the far lane, where a car is still moving and never saw the turner behind the stopped queue. The wave covers one lane. The duty to yield covers every oncoming lane, and the driver in the far lane had the right of way the whole time.
-
The blind turn
Two left-turn lanes face each other across the intersection. A car waiting in the opposite turn lane blocks the turner’s view of the through lanes behind it. The turner goes without seeing and hits the car that was behind it. NHTSA’s causation survey found a driver turned with an obstructed view in 7.8% of intersection crashes. A blocked view is not a defense. It’s the reason to wait.
-
The turn across a motorcycle
The turning driver looks, sees no car, and turns into a rider. Left turns are the leading cause of fatal motorcycle crashes, and the driver’s statement afterward is almost always that they didn’t see the rider. Our motorcycle accident page covers these cases, including why the speeding defense is raised against riders more than anyone.
-
The turn across the crosswalk
A driver turning left on a green or a green arrow is watching oncoming cars and never looks at the crosswalk they’re turning into. § 1111 requires a turning driver to yield to pedestrians lawfully in the crosswalk regardless of the signal. Our pedestrian accident page covers how those claims get built.
The common thread is the one NHTSA found. Inadequate surveillance, meaning the driver didn’t look well enough, was the critical reason in 44.1% of intersection crashes, and a false assumption about what the other driver would do accounted for another 8.4%. Left-turn crashes are rarely mechanical failures or freak events. In most of them, the driver looked and got it wrong.
“The Other Driver Was Speeding”
This is the defense in nearly every left-turn case, and it’s the first thing the turning driver’s insurance company will say to you. They can’t argue their driver had the right of way, so they argue you were going too fast for their driver to have judged the gap.
Two things limit that argument. The first is a 2018 Court of Appeals decision, Rodriguez v. City of New York, which held that a plaintiff moving for summary judgment on liability does not have to prove freedom from comparative negligence. In a left-turn case that means we can ask the court to rule the turning driver liable as a matter of law without first winning the speed argument. If the defense wants to reduce your recovery by claiming you were speeding, that’s their burden to prove at the damages stage, and it does not stop the liability ruling.
The second is what the law expects of a driver with the right of way. You’re required to see what there is to be seen and to use reasonable care, and insurance companies lean on that duty hard. But Goodluck and the cases before it hold that a few seconds of reaction time to a car that turns across your path is not negligence. The question is whether your speed contributed to the crash, not whether you were over the limit at all.
The evidence that settles it is your own car’s data. Most vehicles record roughly five seconds of speed, braking, and throttle before a crash, and the recorder shows exactly how fast you were going and when you hit the brake. If the data shows you at or near the limit with braking before impact, the speeding defense is finished. If it shows something else, we’d rather know on day one than at a deposition. Either way, the car has to be preserved before it’s repaired, because the repair can erase the data.
If You Were the Driver Turning Left
You can still have a case, and if you were hurt, you should have it evaluated.
New York follows pure comparative negligence. A driver who shares fault for a crash recovers damages reduced by their percentage of fault, and a left-turning driver is not automatically 100% responsible. The oncoming driver who ran a red light, entered the intersection after the signal changed, or was traveling far over the limit shares the fault, and in some cases carries most of it. The turning driver’s case is harder than the oncoming driver’s, and the insurance company will treat the turn as the whole story. It isn’t always.
The facts that move fault back toward the oncoming driver are the ones that need to be found quickly. Whether the light had changed. Whether the oncoming driver’s own vehicle data shows excessive speed or no braking. Whether a witness saw the oncoming car accelerate through a stale yellow. Our red light and stop sign page covers how a signal violation by the oncoming driver gets proven.
Passengers in the turning car are in a different position. A passenger is almost never at fault, and a passenger’s claim runs against both drivers in whatever shares a jury or settlement assigns. If you were riding with the driver who turned, your claim doesn’t wait for the drivers to finish blaming each other.
How We Handle Left-Turn Cases
We move for summary judgment on liability as early as the facts support it. Rodriguez makes that motion available without first winning the speed fight, and Goodluck shows what the Second Department does with a clear failure to yield. A liability ruling before trial takes the insurance company’s main negotiating chip off the table and leaves the case about one question, what your injuries are worth.
Getting there means preserving two things immediately. Your car, before anyone repairs it, so the event data survives. And the intersection as it was, which means photographs of the signal heads, the turn lanes, the opposing turn lane, and anything that blocked a sightline, taken before the turning driver’s insurance company builds its version of the scene. The turning driver’s own data matters too, and we send a preservation demand for their vehicle before it’s fixed or sold.
The insurance company already has their driver’s version
It was given within a day of the crash, and it says you were speeding. The evidence that answers it, your car’s data, the signal records, and the witnesses, is easiest to get in the first two weeks. We start there.
The rest of the case is built the way every serious injury case is. Treating physicians and, where the injuries call for it, medical and economic experts documenting the full impact, including future care and lost earning capacity. We handle the insurance calls, the no-fault paperwork, and the treatment authorizations so you don’t have to, and we prepare every case as if it’s going to a jury, because the carriers know which firms do that and it changes the number they offer.
What a Left-Turn Settlement Depends On
Two things. How clean the liability picture is, and what the medical evidence shows.
A left-turn case where the speeding defense has been answered with vehicle data settles like a case the insurance company expects to lose at trial. The same injuries with the speed question still open settle for less, because the carrier prices in the chance a jury assigns you a share of fault, and every percentage point comes out of your recovery. That’s why the data and the signal records get pulled before the first demand goes out, not after.
The damages side turns on whether your injuries meet New York’s serious injury threshold, how consistently they were treated, what the crash cost you in earnings, and whether any of it is permanent. Be skeptical of anyone who quotes you a number before the medical picture is complete. How case value gets evaluated across all of our cases is covered on our Long Island car accident lawyer page, and your no-fault benefits start through the policy of the car you were in regardless of fault, with the application due within 30 days. The details are on our no-fault insurance page.
Free Consultation
Hit by a driver turning left?
The turn was a violation, and the law entitled you to assume it wouldn’t happen. Don’t let an adjuster talk you into a share of the blame. Your consultation is free, and there’s no fee unless we win.
Car Accident verdicts & settlements
$1.5
million
For a client injured in a motor vehicle accident
$1.025
million
for a victim of a drunk driving crash
$975
thousand
For a client injured in a motor vehicle accident
$950
thousand
For a client injured in a motor vehicle accident
$875
thousand
for a client injured while driving for work
$750
thousand
For a knee injury worsened from a car accident
$705
thousand
for a client injured from a rear-end collision
$675
thousand
for a client injured from a low impact rear-end collision
Schedule a Free Consultation
When you’re ready to talk, we’re here. We offer a free, no obligation consultation at any of our 9 offices across Long Island, and we’re happy to come to you if you’re unable to travel. We have been fighting for Long Island families for over 25 years.
We’ll give you our honest assessment and tell you exactly how we’d approach your case. Our record speaks for itself. Our team has never represented an insurance company and never will. When you call Palermo Law, you’ll know quickly why so many Long Island families have trusted us since 1994.
Car Accident Client Testimonials
“…Palermo Law really knows their stuff…”
Palermo Law really knows their stuff when it comes to car accidents. I would confidently recommend them to anyone needing guidance.
“…they were on top of everything…”
Palermo worked relentlessly on my car accident case! There was never a need for me to call for follow-up, as they were on top of everything. If you are ever in need of a top notch attorney for a car accident case, this is your place!
“…They help me get the best amount possible and it was fast!…”
Palermo Law helped me with my car accident, they work with me during this hard time and tried to make it smooth as possible because I was pregnant as well. They help me get the best amount possible and it was fast! I can't thank Michael Enough!
“…Would not hesitate to use them again…”
Helped me with a car accident. They were great, describing the process, and got the settlement done quickly. Would not hesitate to use them again.
“…simple and stress free…”
Palermo Law makes the whole process of being in a car accident simple and stress free
“…all of my questions and concerns were taken care of…”
I used this law office for my car accident and I’m happy I did all of my questions and concerns was taken care of. I would use Palermo law again if I needed to.
“…the best possible settlement after my motor vehicle accident…”
Steven Palermo’s law firm fought for the best possible settlement after my motor vehicle accident. I’d like to especially thank Danielle for her patience with coordinating appointments and explaining the process of MVA cases, to Courtney for keeping track of all of t...
Steven Palermo’s law firm fought for the best possible settlement after my motor vehicle accident. I’d like to especially thank Danielle for her patience with coordinating appointments and explaining the process of MVA cases, to Courtney for keeping track of all of the fine details on our case, and for asking all the questions that we didn’t even know mattered. I would absolutely recommend Palermo law. So much so that this is my second time using them, but fingers crossed that it will also be the last time needing to.
READ MORE
“…I chose Palermo law and it was the best choice I made…”
After my hit and run in March of 2025 I chose Palermo law and it was the best choice I made. Steve and Courtney have gone above and beyond for me and have always fought for me. Their staff is dedicated and gets back to you in a timely manner. They keep you up to date...
After my hit and run in March of 2025 I chose Palermo law and it was the best choice I made. Steve and Courtney have gone above and beyond for me and have always fought for me. Their staff is dedicated and gets back to you in a timely manner. They keep you up to date with your case and never leave you in the dark. They are accommodating and extremely knowledgeable. I highly recommend Palermo law for your accident needs
READ MORELeft-Turn Accident FAQs
Is the driver turning left always at fault in New York?
Almost always, but not automatically. Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141 requires the turning driver to yield to oncoming traffic close enough to be a hazard, and a violation is negligence per se. The turning driver escapes full fault only by proving something about the oncoming driver, such as a red light violation, excessive speed that contributed to the crash, or entry into the intersection after the signal changed. The burden of that proof is on the turning driver.
I had a green light when I turned left. Doesn’t that mean I had the right of way?
No. A steady green light permits a left turn only through a gap in oncoming traffic, and the turning driver yields. Only a steady green arrow gives the turning driver the right of way over oncoming cars, and even then the driver yields to anyone lawfully in the intersection or the crosswalk. A flashing yellow arrow works like a green light, not a green arrow.
The turning driver’s insurance company says I was speeding. Does that end my case?
No. Under the Court of Appeals’ decision in Rodriguez v. City of New York, we can ask the court to rule the turning driver liable without first disproving the speed claim. If the insurance company wants to reduce your recovery for speed, it has to prove your speed contributed to the crash, and your vehicle’s own data usually settles that. A driver with the right of way who had only seconds to react is not at fault for failing to avoid the turn.
What if another driver waved the turning driver through?
The wave doesn’t transfer the duty to yield. A driver who stops and waves is speaking only for the lane they’re in, and § 1141 requires the turning driver to yield to every oncoming vehicle, including the one in the next lane that the stopped car was hiding. In a wave-through crash on a multi-lane road, the driver in the far lane had the right of way, and the turner who relied on the wave failed to yield to it.
Does § 1141 apply when the driver turned into a parking lot instead of at an intersection?
Yes. The statute covers a left turn within an intersection or into an alley, private road, or driveway. A turn across oncoming lanes into a shopping center on Hempstead Turnpike or a gas station on Route 110 carries the same duty to yield as a turn at a signal, with no signal to argue about.
I was turning left and got hit. Can I still recover for my injuries?
Possibly. New York’s pure comparative negligence rule reduces a recovery by your share of fault rather than eliminating it, and a turning driver is not automatically 100% responsible. If the oncoming driver ran a red light, entered after the signal changed, or was traveling far over the limit, fault shifts toward them. The evidence that proves it, signal timing records and the other car’s event data, has to be requested early.
How is a left-turn case different from a T-bone case?
A T-bone is the shape of the impact. A left-turn case is about the cause, and it comes with its own statute. Many left-turn crashes are T-bones, but a left-turn case starts with § 1141 and the turning driver’s duty to yield, which usually makes the liability picture clearer than an intersection dispute where both drivers swear they had the green. Our T-bone page covers the general intersection fault fight; this page covers the turn.

